<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blah &#187; News Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mrasher.com/archives/category/news-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mrasher.com</link>
	<description>This tagline can kiss my ass.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Want To Donate Blood? &#8211; Don&#8217;t Be A Gay Dude</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/03/09/want-to-donate-blood-dont-be-a-gay-dude/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/03/09/want-to-donate-blood-dont-be-a-gay-dude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Informational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay man blood is a funny tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stupid Federal Laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one who didn&#8217;t know that if you&#8217;re gay male &#8211; or ever had a homosexual experience with another guy, even once &#8211; that you&#8217;re banned from donating blood for life? I just read this article by Senator John Kerry, yeah the guy who lost in 2004 to Georgie, arguing for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who didn&#8217;t know that if you&#8217;re gay male &#8211; or ever had a homosexual experience with another guy, even once &#8211; that you&#8217;re banned from donating blood for life?</p>
<p>I just read this article by Senator John Kerry, yeah the guy who lost in 2004 to Georgie, <a href="http://www.baywindows.com/index.php?ch=opinion&amp;sc=guest_opinions&amp;sc2=news&amp;sc3=&amp;id=103015">arguing for a repeal to the federal ban on gay man blood</a>.</p>
<p>Via, I dunno.  But that article is from <a href="http://baywindows.com">Bay Windows</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/03/09/want-to-donate-blood-dont-be-a-gay-dude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Choke-Proof Hot Dog</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/25/a-choke-proof-hot-dog/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/25/a-choke-proof-hot-dog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot dogs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know what it is about this article on hot dogs, but I find it hilarious. Any conversation involving a hot dog is inherently funny.  Just the concept of a choke-proof hot dog conjures up a lot of funny ideas &#8211; what about rectangular shapes, for example.  A couple of highlights from the article: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what it is about this <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-02-22-1Achoke22_ST_N.htm">article on hot dogs</a>, but I find it hilarious. Any conversation involving a hot dog is inherently funny.  Just the concept of a choke-proof hot dog conjures up a lot of funny ideas &#8211; what about rectangular shapes, for example.  A couple of highlights from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you were to take the best engineers in the world and try to design  the perfect plug for a child&#8217;s airway, it would be a hot dog[.]</p></blockquote>
<p>Because the best engineers in the world would sign up for that gig.</p>
<blockquote><p>Janet Riley, president of the National Hot Dog &amp; Sausage Council</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s a title you want on your resume.</p>
<p>Via: <a href="http://usatoday.com">USA Today</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/25/a-choke-proof-hot-dog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Utah Conservatives: Let&#8217;s Eliminate the 12th Grade</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/19/utah-conservatives-lets-eliminate-the-12th-grade/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/19/utah-conservatives-lets-eliminate-the-12th-grade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quality Idea: The gist is, Utah is kinda broke &#8211; like every other state, in order to save some money some Conservatives have suggested eliminating mandatory 12th grade.  I can&#8217;t see how some people might be against this. P.S. Jackie your former state is stupid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality Idea:  The gist is, Utah is kinda broke &#8211; like every other state, in order to save some money some Conservatives have suggested <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/02/16/conservatives-eliminating-12th-grade/">eliminating mandatory 12th grade</a>.  I can&#8217;t see how some people might be against this.</p>
<p>P.S. Jackie your former state is stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/02/19/utah-conservatives-lets-eliminate-the-12th-grade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Delta Airlines Fucking People Even Harder Than Before</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/12/delta-airlines-fucking-people-even-harder-than-before/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/12/delta-airlines-fucking-people-even-harder-than-before/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 16:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Informational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The glorious airline Delta has raised prices on checked luggage. [...]$23 from $15 for the first checked-on bag, and to $32 from $25 for the second bag. Oh man, I can&#8217;t wait to fly them again! Via Market Watch P.S. I hate you Delta.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The glorious airline <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/airline-stocks-mixed-delta-raises-luggage-fees-2010-01-12?reflink=MW_news_stmp">Delta has raised prices on checked luggage</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>[...]$23 from $15 for the first checked-on bag, and to $32 from $25 for the  second bag.</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh man, I can&#8217;t wait to fly them again!</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://marketwatch.com">Market Watch</a></p>
<p>P.S. I hate you Delta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/12/delta-airlines-fucking-people-even-harder-than-before/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heineken Buys Femsa, Brewer of Tecate</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/11/heineken-buys-femsa-brewer-of-tecate/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/11/heineken-buys-femsa-brewer-of-tecate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Informational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heineken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tecate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because I drink a lot of beer, I thought this was newsworthy:  Heineken is buying Femsa, the brewery that makes Tecate, Dos Equis, and Sol for 7.6 billion.  I thought these two sentences from the article were kind of funny: The deal will give Heineken, which brews Amstel and other beers[.] What&#8217;s interesting to me [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because I drink a lot of beer, I thought this was newsworthy:  <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2010/01/11/news/international/Heineken_Femsa/">Heineken is buying Femsa, the brewery that makes Tecate, Dos Equis, and Sol</a> for 7.6 billion.  I thought these two sentences from the article were kind of funny:</p>
<blockquote><p>The deal will give Heineken, which brews Amstel and other beers[.]</p></blockquote>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to me is that they mention that Heineken, the brewery, makes Amstel, which really no-one in the US drinks, but they fail to mention the obvious choice of Heineken, the beer.  Maybe it&#8217;s just too obvious?</p>
<p>The other thing I noticed which is really just funny more than anything is that Heineken&#8217;s Nasdaq symbol is HINKY.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://money.cnn.com">CNN Money</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/11/heineken-buys-femsa-brewer-of-tecate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ah, Crazy People</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/05/ah-crazy-people/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/05/ah-crazy-people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McNuggets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is too funny: A woman goes ape-shit crazy when she can&#8217;t get her McNuggets. Via The Smoking Gun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is too funny: <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2010/0104102mcnuggets1.html">A woman goes ape-shit crazy when she can&#8217;t get her McNuggets</a>.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com">The Smoking Gun</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2010/01/05/ah-crazy-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. Limits Tarmac Waits for Passengers to 3 Hours</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/21/u-s-limits-tarmac-waits-for-passengers-to-3-hours/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/21/u-s-limits-tarmac-waits-for-passengers-to-3-hours/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NY Times has an article about the Transportation Department limiting tarmac waits for passengers to three Hours.  We&#8217;ve been doing a lot of flying this month &#8211; a trip to Las Vegas for Barrett &#38; Lindsay&#8217;s wedding and a trip to Reno to see my grandparents for Christmas.  Our flight to Las Vegas was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NY Times has an article about the Transportation Department <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/business/22passengers.html">limiting tarmac waits for passengers to three Hours</a>.  We&#8217;ve been doing a lot of flying this month &#8211; a trip to Las Vegas for Barrett &amp; Lindsay&#8217;s wedding and a trip to Reno to see my grandparents for Christmas.  Our flight to Las Vegas was pretty much horrible.  On a plane change in Minneapolis, we probably spent a total time of four hours just sitting on a plane that wasn&#8217;t moving &#8211; actually 2 separate planes.  I imagine the fines that will be imposed will be pretty damaging to Delta.</p>
<p>(If you hadn&#8217;t guessed, we flew Delta)</p>
<p>Via  &#8211; <a href="http://nytimes.com">NYTimes.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/21/u-s-limits-tarmac-waits-for-passengers-to-3-hours/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate Change Deniers vs The Consensus &#8211; An Infographic</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/08/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus-an-infographic/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/08/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus-an-infographic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nerdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infographic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a sucker for infographics. I also happen to be one of those crazy people who care about the environment. This infographic on climate change deniers vs the consensus is pretty neat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a sucker for infographics. I also happen to be one of those crazy people who care about the environment. This <a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus/">infographic on climate change deniers vs the consensus</a> is pretty neat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/08/climate-change-deniers-vs-the-consensus-an-infographic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore.) Has An Interesting Idea</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/04/rep-earl-blumenauer-d-ore-has-an-interesting-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/04/rep-earl-blumenauer-d-ore-has-an-interesting-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earl Blumenauer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., has a very interesting idea &#8211; a bill that will withhold Federal health benefits from members of Congress until Health Legislation is passed.  What a novel idea. I wholly support it. Via The Washington Independent PS. I had to look up how to spell wholly, for some reason it just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., has a very interesting idea &#8211; <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/69715/a-bill-to-withhold-federal-health-benefits-from-congress">a bill that will withhold Federal health benefits from members of Congress until Health Legislation is passed</a>.  What a novel idea. I wholly support it.</p>
<p>Via <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com" target="_self">The Washington Independent</a></p>
<p>PS. I had to look up how to spell <em>wholly</em>, for some reason it just seems weird being spelled that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/12/04/rep-earl-blumenauer-d-ore-has-an-interesting-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Soldiers Are We Sending To Afghanistan?</title>
		<link>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/11/24/how-many-soldiers-are-we-sending-to-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/11/24/how-many-soldiers-are-we-sending-to-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News Article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrasher.com/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The answer? No one knows for sure.  But that won&#8217;t stop people from speculating! The Atlantic: [T]he increase in troop strength will be about 25,000 The Atlantic (Again): [E]xpect the commander in chief to approve north of 20,000 additional troops Times Online: [A] surge of at least 25,000 new US troops The Guardian: [E]xpected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The answer? No one knows for sure.  But that won&#8217;t stop people from speculating!</p>
<p><a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/11/will_obama_use_powerpoint_and_other_afghan_questions.php" target="_blank">The Atlantic</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[T]he increase in troop strength will be about 25,000</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/11/obama_has_info_will_make_afghan_decision_shortly.php" target="_blank">The Atlantic</a> (Again):</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="Apple-style-span"><span>[E]xpect the commander in  chief to approve north of 20,000 additional troops</span></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span"><span><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afghanistan/article6929794.ece" target="_blank">Times Online</a>:</span></span></p>
<blockquote><p>[A] surge of at least 25,000 new US  troops</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/24/barack-obama-us-troops-afghanistan">The Guardian</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[E]xpected to send 34,000 more US troops</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/24/obama-administration-afghanistan" target="_blank">The Guardian</a> (Again):</p>
<blockquote><p>[P]oised to announce early next week the deployment of up to 35,000 more  troops</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29865.html" target="_blank">Politico</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[E]xpect him to announce an increase of 20,000 to 40,000 additional  troops</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/23/obama-lock-afghanistan-decision/" target="_blank">Fox News</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[D]eploy an eventual 32,000 to 35,000 U.S. forces</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/25/us/politics/25policy.html?_r=1&amp;hp" target="_blank">New York Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[S]ending about 30,000 additional troops</p></blockquote>
<p>Basically, no one has any idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mrasher.com/archives/2009/11/24/how-many-soldiers-are-we-sending-to-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

